Fantasy Football: Should you try Zero RB this season? Here's everything to know for 2026

· Yahoo Sports

My mom taught my siblings and I almost every card game when we were younger. She didn’t grow up with much, but you could find a pack of bikes on any counter at my grandma’s house. Our favorite game was Rummy. Building runs or finding sets and racking up points until my diabolical mother dropped the concept of “gin” on us. 

Visit afrikasportnews.co.za for more information.

Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2026 NFL season

The first time she dropped all her cards and declared herself out, my jaw dropped. I was mad and impressed simultaneously. Since then, I’ve added the (relatively) extreme strategy to my play. When it works, my wife threatens me with the couch. In other cases, I’m in a different kind of trouble.

That’s the Zero RB draft approach in a nutshell.

It looks drastic. But if it works, your leaguemates praise you for your boldness. In either case, let’s dig into the basics and how we can apply it in 2026.

To be honest, the name of the tactic should nudge you in the right direction. But I’ll use a recent example to highlight the core premise:

Unfortunately, an injury like Ashton Jeanty’s happens every preseason. One of our high-priced skill players suffers an injury or finds themselves in a situation where the potential for them to miss a significant period of the season exists. The reaction from fantasy managers is, well, predictable.

“This is why you don’t draft until the end of the preseason.”

“Always get your RB’s backup just in case!”

The “RBs Don’t Matter” crowd comes alive in these situations. Drafters who were diligently snagging Mike Washington Jr are geniuses. Accordingly, we learn (the hard way) about one of the main tenets of Zero RB.

Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports

The number of RBs with bellcow opportunity shares declines faster than their receiver counterparts. This trend seeds the notion to wait. Of course, the Jeanty to Washington scenario is an abnormal occurrence. Let’s find something more reasonable.

There was a two-round gap in ADP between the New England RBs at the start of the offseason. But as more information came out, the delta decreased. More importantly, managers who opted for a WR over TreVeyon Henderson gain two edges. One, they now have the benefit of a player with a greater chance at more weekly touches. And two, Stevenson’s access to high-leverage touches at a cheaper draft cost gives them a value surplus.

Zero RB aims at avoiding the “risks” of early-round rushers who could turn into busts by focusing on the position with more players getting a high-end workload: wide receivers. As the chart above indicates, our greatest shot at finding pass-catchers earning WR1 treatment stays open well past where the RB pool has dried up. So, until then, holding off on grabbing your RB1 should ensure your roster has the receiving firepower to take on the rest of your league. 

Subscribe to Fantasy Ultra to unlock our Strategy Lab, 150+ page Draft Playbook and more!

Like learning gin rummy for the first time, you’d be hard-pressed not to try and replicate the method on your own. However, like all things, there are some caveats.

It Sounds Easy … And Yet …

So, you’ve got the idea surrounding Zero RB. Vector your roster’s strength to be at WR, take swings at rushers who could turn into weekly contributors later, and profit. But sometimes our attempts look like that scene in The Waterboy where another college puts their towel boy on the field. There’s some nuance to this worth reviewing before heading into your draft.

Like any confident analyst, I’ll give you the best answer I can. It depends.

(Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports)

I built a points-above-replacement model to measure value as a function of draft cost. Essentially, it checks to see if you’re getting something now that you can’t get later. Anyway, two takeaways here.

First, yes, nabbing a QB or TE within the first six rounds has its merits. But the timing matters. Taking the first or second quarterback off the board is different than the QB4 or QB5. And TEs actually tick up in value (over WRs!) in Rounds 4 and 5. But look at the orange line for the larger point.

RBs still have value in the early rounds. In fact, since 2021, at least one eventual top-three PPR RB finisher was drafted inside the first round. Admittedly, this doesn’t solve our “elite RB scarcity” problem. But it does leave the door open for considering a single ball carrier to open our draft (i.e., the Hero RB build).

Anecdotally, that’s what news like Jeanty’s injury causes us to believe. Or take Bucky Irving splitting with Rachaad White and Sean Tucker down the stretch of ‘25. Nobody wanted to believe a change was happening until we saw it each week. However, those cases are in the minority.

(Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports)

I went through the weekly usage reports and tracked how often an RB1 or WR1 maintained their role. A one-game blip didn’t count. Tee Higgins sometimes outshines Ja’Marr Chase. But a multi-game adjustment of their positions on the totem pole would cause a ruckus. Regardless, RBs who got the nod to be the top option kept it more often than receivers. All of which lends more credence to the suggestion that there’s more stability to RBs than we give them credit.

That’s the natural extension of the workload decline that we laid out earlier. Increased touches lead to greater scoring. As a result, if more WRs with a higher share of touches are available early, they should be putting up more points than their ball-carrying brethren. The data says otherwise.

(Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports)

Using the same weekly dataset, I calculated how much each player bounces around every Thursday, Sunday and Monday. First, the averages between the two positions are essentially the same. But even their week-to-week swings line up. So, taking an RB or two to kick off your draft can still work.

Now, with an honest evaluation of Zero RB, let’s apply it.

To recap, Zero RB doesn’t have a stringent requirement on when to take your first rusher. It’s more about understanding where the projectable opportunities dissipate. But if history gives us any clues, that happens toward the end of the early rounds.

  • Round 4: 35% (RB hit rate)

  • Round 5: 24%

  • Round 6: 24%

  • Round 7: 18%

I pulled the same value from our “bellcow workload bar” earlier and isolated the running back values. The hit rate drops by half between Rounds 4 and 7. Said another way, we’re almost out of viable options. But we can’t just draft a guy because he has “RB” next to his name.

(Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports)

I went back to my study of the RB Dead Zone to pull out a profile of a rusher with the potential to outkick their ADP. And the summary didn’t stop at their intrinsic abilities. Their environment matters, too. However, since we’ll be pulling from the RB well deep into drafts, I looked at ball carriers with late-round draft prices, too. Coincidentally, the same metrics floated to the top.

Intuitively, this makes sense. After the elites go in the first few rounds, we’re buying as many narratives as possible for how things can break in favor of our mid-round targets. And the plot lines extend into the double-digit portion of the draft. However, regardless of what pick slot you get, there’ll be options available to you.

(Photo by Chris Allen/Yahoo Sports)

The study on RB archetypes narrowed my focus down to a shorter list of candidates. Reviewing the latest ADP did the rest. And no matter where your draft slot, the blueprint doesn't really change: load up on receivers while the bell-cow well is still full, then start dipping into RBs once the position dwindles.

Sitting in an early slot? Lock in the WR tier through the first four rounds. There's more of it left at pick 4 than you'd think. Your first running back swing shouldn't come until round 5, right where a back like David Montgomery, with access to early-down and short-yardage work, is still sitting there.

Middle slots get a gift the other two don't. You can get two shots at the RB pool on the wrap in Rounds 5 and 6 while it's still worth shooting at. Or, if you'd rather, use one of those picks on a QB instead — turns out that's the best onesie value in the whole draft, RB included.

Late slot drafters get spoiled at receiver. Two full rounds pass before you pick again, so the WR run stays deep the longest. That's your strongest case for riding Zero RB the furthest — a back like Bucky Irving doesn't need to enter the conversation until Round 5, and by then your receivers have already done the heavy lifting.

Honestly, going back to the mid-round plan in the chart above, I have my concerns about the Browns’ offense given their QB situation. You could persuade me to take Henderson’s right-tail outcome over the median outlook for Judkins. In either case, based on the names, you can pattern-match their play styles and offenses to find similar RBs to add to your squad later.

  • RJ Harvey (103.5 ADP) – started in Week 2 of the preseason and capped off a drive with a 21-yard touchdown; JK Dobbins already dealing with a minor soft-tissue injury.

  • Jordan Mason (116.2 ADP) – listed as co-starter alongside Aaron Jones Sr.; camp reporting indicates a bigger share of backfield touches is a possibility for '26.

  • MarShawn Lloyd (131.5 ADP) – taking first-team reps while Jacobs was out of training camp.

  • Tyjae Spears (133.3 ADP) – has matched Tony Pollard in touches and out-snapped Pollard in Week 1.

These are the type of RBs with weekly standalone value and the contingent upside should their situation change. In any other roster build, they’d be a boon for your team. But if you’re already strong at WR and now you have access to an RB1 workload, that’s gin.

Read full story at source